The Remedies

---

Lawyers for the government insisted Mr Johnson would Emerge in accordance with The Law

The British government "cannot be trusted" to comply with The Law to avoid a no-Deal , Scotland's highest court was told.

"Court of Session" will be asked to explain what sanctions would not apply if the Minister of the offspring, referred to as the Benn Action.

documents confirming Boris Johnson , if a Deal is not agreed by 19. October.

But the petitioners said That this contradicts other statements.

Under the Benn Action, the last month, the EU, the request of a Brexit-extension adopted, the need to write to the Prime Minister , if no Deal is signed off Parliament of 19. October, unless MPs agree to an no business to Leak.

the suspicion That Mr. Johnson may try to circumvent this law to a new case in the Court of Session.

businessman Dale Vince , QC Jo Maugham and SNP-MP-Joanna Cherry have, The Judge asked The Penalty for non-compliance.

But a document written confirmed by the British government, it would write a letter to request a delay, if no Deal is agreed, the of 19. October.

The government's lawyer, Andrew Webster QC told the court, "it could not be clearer" That it did not intend to comply with The Law .

Mr. Webster argued to be sent, it force had no need for a purchase order, a letter to, because the court had noted That it would be done.

Asked judge Lord Pentland, why the non-written declarations under oath, would do to dispel the concerns of the petitioner, Mr Webster said this was not necessary.

He also argued That the court's decision, the "ruin" of the government's negotiating position with the EU, added was: "It would be quite inappropriate to give to the court the arena of the negotiation by saying, what can be done. "

Joanna Cherry and Jo Maugham argue, Boris Johnson , doesn't have the courage to be. on Brexit

But Aidan O'neill QC, for the petitioners, Mr Johnson claimed it was because of earlier statements against what was said in the court documents

He pointed to commitments made by the Prime Minister That he would rather like to send "dead in a ditch" as a letter requesting an extension, and That the UK will leave, at 31. October is "eat or die".

Mr O'neill said: "We can not trust this government, given the statements he has made, That it will comply with The Law . "

Lord Pentland, his judgment will deliver on Monday.

A separate aspect of the case -whether the court could use its "nobile officium" makes, in fact, sign a letter to the European heads of state and government on Mr. Johnson's name be considered by a panel of judges of the Inner House, the judges on the upcoming Tuesday.

At a preliminary hearing, a judge said it would be "never" for an official's powers in this way as the nobile officium power has never before a Prime Minister was.

Why are there two parts to the case? Bbc Scotland political correspondent Andrew Kerr explained

you can think of this as a train - But a part of the train is disconnected, and you go a slightly different track.

Under the Benn Action, Boris Johnson has been searching for a Brexit extension, if it is not a offer you signed by the Parliament.

The case, heard today from Mr Pentland is about The Remedies , or punishments could be brought to the Prime Minister , if he is not an extension, whether a fine or imprisonment.

Next week in this other case - to the nobile officium, That is whether the court has The Power , a letter to sign, in The Absence of Boris Johnson is applying for an extension, if he refuses to do That .

That The Letter would be signed by the clerk of the court.

all of the appeal to the Supreme court with a decision.

The government has said it will want to The Law , But it will test the limits of what is prescribed by law.

The British government has insisted That it remains focused on sealing a Deal with the EU to ensure the UK can leave at the end of October, the current date, But said a no-Deal exit is the only other alternative.

A senior Downing Street source, the BBC, the imposed Benn Act "only said That a very specific, narrow duty on the Parliament of The Letter requesting a delay".

The Source added: "The government is not prevented by The Act of other things, which do not cause any delay, including communication, private and public. "

Mr Johnson himself New Deal or no Deal tweeted: "But no delay. #GetBrexitDone #LeaveOct31"

At the end of Friday's hearing, one of the petitioners, Jo Maugham, QC, accused Boris Johnson , the contradictory statements.

Speaking outside court, he said: "The Prime Minister said, for the First Time , he would send to send The Letter , of the Parliament requires him to be - That is The Letter of the EU for an extension on the 31. October.

"The Prime Minister also said, for the First Time , That he does not frustrate Parliament's intention.

"The reason That 's so important is That at the same time, he tells the Parliament That we on the 31. October come what may. "

"There is no way to reconcile these two statements. "

boris johnson, joanna cherry, scotland brexit, economic effects of brexit, court of session, brexit

Source of news: bbc.com