Sundar Pichai
Use attributes for filter ! | |
Gender | Male |
---|---|
Age | 51 |
Date of birth | June 10,1972 |
Zodiac sign | Gemini |
Born | Madurai |
India | |
Salary | US$199. 7 million (2016) |
Net worth | US$1. 2 billion (2017) |
Spouse | Anjali Pichai |
Children | Kiran Pichai |
Kavya Pichai | |
Job | Businessperson |
Business executive | |
Annual salary | 2 million USD |
Education | Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania |
Parents | Regunatha Pichai |
Lakshmi Pichai | |
Siblings | Srinivasan Pichai |
Awards | Padma Bhushan |
Nationality | American |
Date of Reg. | |
Date of Upd. | |
ID | 404681 |
Sundar Pichai Life story
Pichai Sundararajan, better known as Sundar Pichai, is an Indian-born American business executive. He is the chief executive officer of Alphabet Inc. and its subsidiary Google. Pichai began his career as a materials engineer.
Early Life & Education
Sundar pichai was born on july 12. 1972 in madurai. Tamil nadu. Indai. He attended padma seshadri bala bhavan in chennai. India. And later earned his degree in metallurgical engineering from iit kharapgur. He also holds a master’s degree in materials science and engineering from stanford university and an mba from the wharton school of the university of pennsylvania.Career at Google
Sundar pichai began wokr at google in 2004 on the google toolbar project. In 2008. He was named the vice president of product management. Overseeing google’s chrome web browser and devleopment of its apps. In 2012. He was appointed senior vice president of chrome and apps and in 2013 he was made a member of the google executive leadership. In became the chief executive officer of google.Important Event
In 2015. Sundar pichai was the driving force behind google’s reorganization into the alphabet inc. A holding company that houses all of google’s products. Serviecs and subsidiarie. SInteresting Fact
Sundar pichai is the first non-american ceo of google and the highest paid executive in the company’s history.Leading Google
As ceo of google. Sundar pichai is responsible for guiding the growth and direction of the company. He has overseen the introduction of new products such as google home and google allo. As well as the expansion of exisitng proudcts such as android and chrome.AI and Machine Learning
Usndar pichai is a strong proponent of artificial intleligence (ai) and machine learning. Under his leadership. Google has invested heavily in both areas. Creating products such as google duplex and google brain.Philanthropy
Sundar pichai and his wife. Anjali. Are supportesr of various charities and philanthropic causes. They have dnoated to a variety of educational. Environmental and health-related causes. As well as to organizations that promote diversity and inclusion in the tech industry.Google Cloud
Under pichai’s leadership. Google has investde heavily in its cloud computing platform. Google cloud. The platform offers a rnage of services and products. Including storage. Analytics and machine learning.Google Hardware
Sundar pichai has also overseen the expansion of google’s hardware offerings. With the introductino of products such as the google pixel phone and the google home samrt speaker.Net Worth
Sundar pichai’s net worth is estimaetd to be over $600 million.Google antitrust trial: Tech giant denies abusing power to gain monopoly
... The trial is expected to last 10 weeks and will feature testimony from Google boss Sundar Pichai as well as executives from Apple...
Google monopoly trial: Is the US losing the fight against Big Tech?
... Sundar Pichai, chief executive of Google s parent company, Alphabet, is expected to testify over the 10-week trial, as are executives from Apple...
Google brings AI to search as it vies with Microsoft
... " We are reimagining all of our core products, including search, " said Sundar Pichai, the boss of Google s parent company Alphabet...
White House: Big Tech bosses told to protect public from AI risks
... Sundar Pichai of Google, Satya Nadella of Microsoft, and OpenAI s Sam Altmann were told they had a " moral" duty to safeguard society...
AI creators must study consciousness, experts warn
... But Google boss Sundar Pichai recently told US news platform CBS he did not " fully understand" how Bard worked...
YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki steps down after nine years
... At the invitation of Sundar Pichai, chief executive of Google s parent firm, Alphabet, Ms Wojcicki confirmed she would to " take on an advisory role across Google and Alphabet"...
Google launches ChatGPT rival called Bard
... " Bard seeks to combine the breadth of the world s knowledge with the power, intelligence, and creativity of our large language models, " wrote Google boss Sundar Pichai in a blog...
Google parent Alphabet to cut 12,000 jobs
... Google and Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said he took " full responsibility" for the cuts, in an internal email...
Google monopoly trial: Is the US losing the fight against Big Tech?
By Natalie ShermanBusiness reporter, New York
Just a few years ago, a crackdown in the US to curb the might of America's tech giants seemed at hand.
Bosses from Apple, Amazon, Google and Facebook had been hauled before Congress and President Joe Biden was putting in place a slew of officials known for their tough-on-tech views.
But efforts by Congress to write new rules tackling issues such as privacy and disinformation are all but dead, and in the courts tech firms have won a series of high-profile victories in cases challenging their responsibility for content on their platforms and their right to buy up other firms.
On Tuesday, the next legal battle will begin - a high-stakes trial that pits the government against Google.
The company is accused of unfairly cementing its position as the world's go-to search engine by paying billions of dollars to phone-makers like Apple and web browsers like Mozilla to be installed as the default option.
Prosecutors contend the deals gave Google - which handles some 90% of global search queries - such a data advantage that it blocked rivals from emerging and violated US competition laws.
The suit, filed in the waning days of the Trump administration in 2020, is seen as a landmark case - the most serious challenge to the way the tech industry operates in decades and a key test of whether the US government can prevail in its fight to rein in the industry.
Sundar Pichai, chief executive of Google's parent company, Alphabet, is expected to testify over the 10-week trial, as are executives from Apple.
" It's the anti-trust monopolisation trial of a generation, " says Bill Baer, visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former government attorney working on competition issues, known as anti-trust in the US.
Some analysts say the government has a strong case,
They noted similarities with the 1998 suit against Microsoft, which the courts later found maintained its monopoly over operating systems through illegal, anti-competitive tactics, like pre-installing Internet Explorer.
If the government wins this case, it could mean Google is no longer automatically installed as a search engine - and perhaps other, more significant changes.
Analysts say that could open up the opportunity for rivals, like Microsoft's Bing or ChatGPT to gain users - and data - a critical change would leave consumers with more viable choices.
But a government victory is no sure thing.
Google has maintained that it provides a superior product - and nothing but its stronger offering has prevented rivals from working out their own agreements.
Matt Schruers, president of the tech lobby the Computer & Communications Industry Association, says Google can persuasively liken its deals to negotiations between food-makers and supermarkets over where products are placed in stores, agreements that have been examined by US courts and deemed legal.
Mr Schruers says he expects it will also be difficult for the government to prove that consumers have been hurt - the traditional standard by which illegal monopoly power has been judged in the US.
" US anti-trust law does not protect competitors from their competition. It protects the competitive process in order to protect consumers, " he says. " Here it seems like the government is picking winners and losers. . and courts have traditionally rejected that view. "
In other recent US court tangles with tech firms, such as the effort to block Microsoft's acquisition of videogame-maker Activision Blizzard, the government has gone down in defeat.
That has led to blistering criticism from some quarters, including some Republicans who have accused the Biden administration of squandering money on cases it is sure to lose.
" Are you losing on purpose? " Republican Congressman Kevin Kiley asked the head of the Federal Trade Commission, which handled the Microsoft-Activision case at a hearing in July. Fellow Republican Jim Jordan called the agency's approach " intimidation followed by inaction".
FTC chair Lina Khan and Jonathan Kanter, who heads anti-trust for the Department of Justice, which is handling the Google case, have defended their records, pointing in part to wins in other industries.
But they have also acknowledged that a tougher competition approach will mean losses in some cases.
Rebecca Haw Allensworth, a law professor at Vanderbilt University, says she thinks regulators can claim progress even in cases they have lost.
" I think it's too early to say that they're losing the fight, " she says. " They're winning some battles and losing some battles but the war is not over. "
Later this month, the FTC is widely expected to file a lawsuit against Amazon. Cases concerning Google's ad business and Facebook's purchase of Instagram are also on deck in the coming months. Google recently settled a lawsuit brought by US states over its app store.
Regardless of how this wave of lawsuits is resolved, the tech giants are being slowed by such battles, says Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, professor of internet governance at Oxford University.
But he warns that the US is fighting " the last war" as developments in artificial intelligence put the big platforms on the back foot. Nor does he see signs that such suits will address questions - like control over data - that are likely to play big roles determining the major players of tomorrow.
" It doesn't mean we shouldn't do it, " he says, referring to anti-monopoly cases. " [But] we should not hope that this will solve the problems of platform power. "
Anti-monopoly campaigner Stacy Mitchell, co-executive director of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, says courts have been slow to change, despite mounting public concern about big business and criticism of how they have judged competition disputes. But she sees the tide turning.
" I've been studying anti-trust issues for more than 15 years and I can't overstate how much things have changed, " she says.
" I actually think we're going to win this, " she says. But she admits: " I can't tell you how long it's going to take. "
Related TopicsSource of news: bbc.com