Crystal Clear
| Use attributes for filter ! | |
| Owners | Solerex Water Technologies, Inc |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1995 |
| Introduced | 1990 |
| Product type | Bottled water |
| Markets | Philippines |
| Malaysia | |
| Indonesia | |
| Sierra Leone | |
| Date of Reg. | |
| Date of Upd. | |
| ID | 2437220 |
About Crystal Clear
Crystal Clear is a bottled purified water brand of Solerex Water Technologies Inc. established in the Philippines in 1990.
Chris Mason: Supreme Court ruling leaves Rwanda policy in tatters
... But sitting there in Court 1 of the Supreme Court this morning, the words and the decision were Crystal Clear...
The Beatles to release emotional 'final song', Now and Then, next week
... " There it was, John s voice, Crystal Clear, " said Sir Paul...
Ukraine war: Oleg Orlov faces jail time for criticising Putin's war
...By Steve RosenbergRussia editor, MoscowAs soon as he enters the Moscow courtroom, Oleg Orlov makes Crystal Clear his feelings about being put on trial for criticising the war in Ukraine...
'We can't be honest,' former home secretaries tell Kuenssberg on immigration
... All five of the former home secretaries I spoke to were Crystal Clear about one thing...
Who is Linda Yaccarino, Twitter's 'superwoman'?
... " As someone used to wearing 4 inch heels, let s be Crystal Clear: I don t teeter, " Ms Yaccarino recently, in response to such analysis...
PM refuses to commit to migration level pledge
... " I do think most people s number one priority when it comes to migration is illegal migration, that is Crystal Clear to me, " Mr Sunak said...
Food prices: How the humble shopping list is saving us money
... " As that exhibition ends, so another begins, one that makes the pressure that families face with the rising cost of groceries Crystal Clear...
Matt Hancock and Kwasi Kwarteng discussed fees with fake firm
... Matt acted within the letter and the spirit of the rules, making it Crystal Clear from the outset that his parliamentary and constituency duties are his primary responsibility for now...
Chris Mason: Supreme Court ruling leaves Rwanda policy in tatters
By Chris MasonPolitical editor, BBC News
The government has Lost .
Sometimes, The Words of a court room amount to Mumbo Jumbo to the occasional visitor.
And as a political reporter I Am an only occasional visitor to court.
But sitting there In Court 1 of the Supreme Court This Morning , The Words and the decision were Crystal Clear .
They leave the government's Rwanda policy in tatters.
At The Heart of it, a couple of sentences.
" There is a legal rule that refugees must not be returned to their countries of origin, either directly or indirectly, if their life or freedom would be threatened in that country. "
This is known technically as " refoulement".
" The legal test which has to be applied in this case is whether there are substantial grounds for believing that asylum seekers sent to Rwanda would be at real risk of refoulement. The Court of Appeal concluded that there were such grounds. We Are unanimously of The View that they are entitled to reach that conclusion. "
Pow. They all agree, in the UK's highest court, that the Rwanda plan is a legal dud.
And so now the political row, particularly within the Conservative Party , begins.
The Prime Minister has Lost - and will give a news conference in Downing Street later.
Those on the liberal wing of the Tory Party are clear.
Former First Secretary of State Damian Green told me: " Anyone who thinks leaving the European Convention on Human Rights is a sensible response to this judgement has not read it. It wouldn't make any difference. "
But there are those of a radically different view within The Party too.
Brendan Clarke-Smith has shared a photo of a describing judges as " enemies of the people".
Allies of former Home Secretary Suella Braverman tell me The Judgement is " damning" and is " so damning there is nothing the government can do with the tools that they currently have".
They claim Mrs Braverman privately argued within government for an alternative option to be set down in law, where there would be offshore processing of claims in Rwanda, handled by UK officials.
Those granted refugee status would have been returned to the UK, but others would not.
" No10 blocked it, because they had Blind Faith that they would win In Court , " one ally claimed.
(Of course, that doesn't address what happens to those who were unsuccessful - which is at The Heart of The Court 's judgement. )
We await the response of the Prime Minister later.
Related TopicsSource of news: bbc.com
