Thomas Markle

The Duchess of Sussex has shown, SMS-messages, and Prince Harry sent her father before her wedding, as part of a lawsuit against the publisher of the Mail on Sunday.

Meghan receivables Newspapers quoted by the news to paint the pair in a less good light.

she also claims tabloid Newspapers, especially those owned by The Group , caused a dispute between her and her father.

Associated newspapers, says it will defend the privacy claim "vigorously".

It Comes , as Meghan and Harry, the to California, after a step, said back, as senior royals, the British tabloid press.

Meghan brought the action to a hand-written letter she sent to her father, Thomas Markle , appeared in the Mail on Sunday.

she claims The Letter was selectively edited to portray by The Paper your "negative".

court papers with the text messages submitted, prior to an expected hearing This Week .

The legal document claims, you show the newspaper group, edited the news of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex sent Mr Markle before their wedding on the 19. May 2018.

that on the 5. May 2018 Meghan wrote in a text to her father: "I called and texted but still no reply from you, hope you're okay."

she then messaged her father The Next day, after finding photos of her father was staged for a paparazzo photographer, the document said.

"you explained that you had tried discreetly to arrange logistics and care for your father and not to feed with privacy, with care The Press that they are trying to protect your father from increased press intrusion and control, and he should keep a Low Profile until The Wedding ," she says.

On 14 may 2018, is it, Mr Markle sent Meghan a SMS to apologize to a message, and to confirm that he was not at The Wedding .

It is said that about half an hour later, after several calls from Mr. Markle sent unanswered, Prince Harry , The Following messages to Mr Markle by Meghan phone:

"Tom, it's Harry and I'll call you now. Please Pick Up , thank you"

"Tom, Harry again! Really need to talk to, to apologize to u. U need, we understand that the circumstances, but "Going Public " is, The Situation will only get worse. If u love Meg and want to do it right to please Call Me because there are two other options, not talking with u to the media, which created, by the way, this whole situation. So, please Call Me so I can explain. Meg and I are not evil, we need only to speak to u. thanks"

"Oh, a word to The Press WILL backfire, Trust Me , Tom. Only we can help u, as we have tried from day 1".

The legal document, it has been claimed by the newspaper, the summary of these messages contained "significant omissions", if it is "reported only", the messages said: "we need Mr Markle to ask for apology, and that he should call".

The document says that the description of another exchange "is intentionally under" any reference to Meghan or Prince Harry is trying to protect you, Mr. Markle, and to ensure that he was Safe .

The document that is the UK tabloid media, in particular Newspapers, harassed, humiliated, and manipulated, Mr. Markle.

Meghan claims, the newspaper of The Group , caused, the very "argument" that you claim to rights to the publication of The Letter , and also caused "significant damage" to their relationship.

she throws The Paper to the misuse of their private data, copyright violations, and selective editing published, if the private letter to your father.

The Mail on Sunday said it was "huge and legitimate" public interest in the publication of The Letter .

The Paper argues that the members of the Royal Family , including The Duchess of Sussex, "to rely on advertising and to keep your life, The Privileged positions they hold and promote themselves".

she claims, Meghan, "you do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy that the contents of The Letter , the private goods and would remain so".

As evidence that you do not violate your privacy, The Paper said The Letter was "argued immaculately curved handwriting copied" in Meghan 's"", that this care was called in the presentation, he expected would be seen and read by a larger Audience .

Source of news: bbc.com