Thomas Markle

read the 44-page defence of the Mail on Sunday to The High Court and you will quickly understand why the Royal Family rarely return to the courts in their endless battles with the media.

in February of last year, the Mail on Sunday published excerpts from a letter to The Duchess of Sussex had written to her father, Thomas Markle , in August 2018. This letter referred to the period of The Wedding with The Duke of Sussex in may of the same year.

The publication of The Letter by the E-Mail on Sunday followed hard on The Heels of an article in the American magazine "People", where five people, who will remain unnamed, but reported that a part of The Duchess ' Inner Circle , put their side of the story.

In this article, it was suggested, by a "long-time friend," the Thomas Markle be Meghan or Prince Harry calls and he refused, in a car sent him to The Airport And Then in the United Kingdom for The Wedding .

"He knows How To reported to In Touch ," a friend, as a matter of course. "Your phone number has not changed. He is never called; he never texted. "

The article also referred to a letter that she wrote to her father, and begged him to stop, criticize you.

the publication of The Letter , the the about. It claims the infringement of copyright, breach of data regulation laws, and a violation of their right to privacy. She has also claimed that The Letter was selectively edited.

The Mail on Sunday, the presses again on all three charges - existing fact and the exhortation says that the copyright applies to the work of the author's own intellectual creation; The Letter was a "pre-" and is not protected as such by copyright.

The newspaper says that when The Personal data was not as topics that Meghan was in the Public Domain , the processing and the publication unlawful.

And it says that, by part of The British Royal Family - the "generate and rely on advertising about yourself... in order to maintain the privileged positions they hold" - it is, quite rightly, the enormous public interest in its history.

But the Mail on Sunday "defence" goes Further - Much Further .

It notes that Meghan will ask to hold her father, The Letter private.

It says The Letter was apparently "copied from pristine", without the "crossings-out or changes", as though Meghan is expected to be released.

It says the way The Letter reads - "to put [Megan] and her behavior in The Best light" suggests that The Duchess wanted or expected it to be read by others.

The Mail on Sunday accuses the friends of Meghan's, who spoke to People magazine. And it does this by Meghan's father, Thomas .

He says he will call and text his daughter in The Weeks before The Wedding that he tell her, he couldn't make it to The Wedding , and that, if after The Wedding he tried to call her again, he was cut off from the couple.

The Mail on Sunday presents the publication of Meghan's letter to her father, as his answer to the lies he says were from your friends in the People magazine article.

Quite how Much of the above is relevant for the actual case to the debate. But the tone and content of the defence offered by the Mail on Sunday, A Shot across the bow of team Meghan.

It is a little taste of what you are trying, the Mail on Sunday to court over - not centered on copyright and data regulations, but Meghan's character, their credibility, and the way you treated your Family .

And standing in front of the court, supported the Mail on Sunday, could be Thomas , her father, - who is willing to go to court, his daughter Samantha told the BBC.

It is an amazing view - and a reminder of why The Royals reach so rare for your attorneys, such as this.

Source of news: bbc.com