Thomas Markle

in the Midst of the ongoing dispute between Britain's tabloid Newspapers, and The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, The Bbc 's royal correspondent asks: what recent developments mean to say about the couple and their fight in order to protect your privacy on?

lawyers for The Duchess of Sussex have painted a picture done by A Woman bitterly wronged, as part of the

Meghan, the action brought to a handwritten Letter she sent to her father, Thomas Markle , was published in the newspaper.

In court records filed on your name - in the Prince Harry has a walk on part - the couple react Associated newspapers " defence of The Mail on Sunday the publication of The Letter . to speak

through the empowerment of their friends, People magazine, and That if one of them is mentioned, The Letter , the E-Mail on Sunday, The Right to publish it.

But Meghan is not just Says That you allow yourself to talk to your friends, the magazine, and would never want to have news about the letters to be published.

And points to the lack of prove That they are entitled to talk to your friends.

The text messages sent to you and Harry, her father Thomas in The Days leading up to your wedding in may of 2018, make it clear, the degree of concern That the couple had for A Man who was clearly out of his depth, as the Fleet Street ' circling s finest in.

The British tabloid media, in particular Newspapers, accused by Meghan of harassment, humiliation and Manipulation of a susceptible Thomas Markle , causing "significant damage" to The Relationship between him and Meghan.

And at no point Meghan was approached for a comment before publication, she Says .

whatever the Legal Rights and wrongs, it is not difficult to have pity with Meghan and Harry.

His Mother 's relationship with the media tortured is played>back. She is who you see your relationship with your father is defibrated in order to sell Newspapers. All That on the eve of their wedding.

But on the same day as these court papers were published, came The Announcement from the couple - Even to the extent of refusing to confirm or deny their stories.

"No confirmation", they say, with The Sun , The Mirror , the Express and the E-Mail", and zero commitment".

This is not, you say, on the avoidance of criticism. The media have every right to and comment on. But it can't, you say, is based on a lie. The lies, or the lies you do not specify.

The couple made it clear That if they wanted Nothing More to do with the obligations of the "Royal Rota " - The Way , the Royal Family and the media coverage organize.

That was part of The Deal - no more public money, not more of The Royal duties, and in return, the couple would not say to The Press and the cameras, were what she.

It still has no official confirmation That the couple lives in Los Angeles . On-the-record information about the pair of their speakers has been thin on the ground for months.

So, how much changes for The Papers made?

Asked what difference the new policy would be said to a reporting, a senior source in one of Britain's most popular papers to you for a moment, "zero".

The couple say they do not avoid the try to critique to. But by picking and choosing those points of sale, who Will Talk to you, you inevitably open the fee.

outlets now think twice what you write or say, afraid That you cut off will be next? It is what the couple want?

This is the reason why The Society of editors, condemned The Move as "censorship".

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, please stand up?

It's the couple who provoke sympathy in The Court records, which released today.

And there are the few who think That now is The Right time to exercise their disputes with the best-selling papers, The Nation , you have to leave.

Source of news: bbc.com