Richmond Park

---

, The court of appeal is due to the increase in the rule on The Plan for the construction of a third runway at Heathrow, The Number of flights to and from The Airport in London.

to expand The idea of Heathrow has been talked about for many years and while many companies support it, The Plan has also a lot of opposition from environmentalists and local residents are attracted to

So, what exactly is the third runway proposal, and what are the arguments for and against are you?

What is The Plan of the Heathrow expansion?

Heathrow is already the UK's busiest airport, serving over 80 million passengers per year. The Airport currently has four terminals and two runways.

If it gets The Green light, the construction of a new runway expected to be completed between 2028 and 2029.

Last Summer , Heathrow Airport had a previous completion in 2026 under their "master plan". But The Airport was forced to revise your Time plan after the Civil Aviation Authority - aviation Authority warned that the "aggressive Time were able to leave plan" passengers will cover the cost.

the construction of the new runway would mean, rivers to divert, to move from streets and diversion of the M25 through a tunnel under the new runway.

But this would not be the end of The Project . The work is expected until 2050, with extensive upgrades to the existing terminals two and Five , as well as plans for new Park homes.

Heathrow Airport says The Project will be financed privately.

What are the arguments for a third runway?

more and More people are traveling by plane, than before, and that the left-hand search, the government the possibilities for the expansion of The Airport capacity.

The Cbi , the equivalent of a British company - says a third runway will "set the UK on course for a bright trading future".

The expansion will also benefit passengers, according to The Department for Transport.

More Than 40% of UK exports to non-EU countries are now going through Heathrow, according to chief executive John Holland-Kaye. He says that a third runway is of vital importance to the strengthening of International Trade relations.

"If we don't expand our only hub airport, we fly over Paris, to the global markets. "

Heathrow Airport also says it will aim for the introduction of legally binding environmental - including noise, air quality and carbon dioxide emissions.

What are the arguments against?

the Local and environmental groups have dismissed assurances from Heathrow Airport and to say that a new runway would mean unacceptable noise and pollution, as well as adding to the UK's carbon dioxide emissions from the increasing number of flights.

The Proposal also "" by the government by 2050 climate neutral strategy, according to Green MP Caroline Lucas .

Rupa Huq - Labour MP for neighbouring Ealing Central and Acton - crazy under The Plan "completely" and says: "Heathrow is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide in Europe ."

Anti-expansion protesters mounted legal challenges against the government

campaign groups have also expressed opposition.

"What hits you is the scale of these proposals," said John Stewart , the chair of the Hacan group.

"The impact on local people could be difficult to come to be for many years to come. Disturbance from construction, demolition of houses, the reality of More Than 700 additional planes on the day. "

In all, 761 houses are expected to go to,

Heathrow says, he pays the full market value plus 25% for real-estate in your of expropriation zone, as well as for some of the houses in the area.

What has the government of it?

The third runway question, Prime Minister Boris Johnson in an awkward Position - especially since his Uxbridge and South Ruislip seat next to Heathrow.

In the year 2015, he said: "I'm going to lie down in front of the bulldozers and the construction of the third runway. "

But, if in the year 2018, Mr Johnson - who was foreign Minister at the Time - missed the vote, as he was traveling to Afghanistan.

Mr. Johnson is not The First watch to fight with the Heathrow expansion issue.

The Labour government first gave the third runway, says green light in 2009, the former Prime Minister , Gordon Brown , it was necessary for economic reasons.

But The Plan was later scrapped by the Conservative-Lib Dem government in 2010. David Cameron , the Prime Minister was, after Mr. Brown had previously excluded, a Heathrow extension "".

Five years ago, Mr Johnson said he would stop to lie down in front of the Bulldozer, a third runway to be built

A few years later, was Set Up to look like you with London airport capacity problems. In the year 2015.

was published A year after the report of The Commission , is under Theresa May 's leadership.

However, the decision caused some turmoil within the Conservative Party . Zac Goldsmith the MP for Richmond Park , has a mandate to protest.

The Conservatives 2019 election program says that while the third runway is a private project, Heathrow has to prove, is able to meet its air quality and noise commitments.

What happens next?

Heathrow Airport is the assessment of answers to currently.

A final plan will then need to be submitted to the planning inspectorate - a public-law entity, which makes decisions on major infrastructure projects. To approve a final decision by the transport Secretary.

The government is also facing a legal challenge. Activists argue that The Proposal is not unlawful, because you take into account the Paris climate agreement to limit global temperature rise to under 2C.

So, depending on the result - there is still no guarantee for the third runway.

heathrow airport expansion, air travel, construction industry, london heathrow airport

Source of news: bbc.com