Gina Miller
| Use attributes for filter ! | |
| Gender | Female |
|---|---|
| Age | 59 |
| Date of birth | April 19,1965 |
| Zodiac sign | Aries |
| Born | British Guiana |
| Nationality | British |
| Books | Rise: Life Lessons in Speaking Out, Standing Tall & Leading the Way |
| Rise | |
| Rise: Life Lessons in Speaking Out, Standing Tall Leading the Way | |
| My Life As A Horse | |
| Spouse | Alan Miller |
| Jon Maguire | |
| Job | Politician |
| Philanthropist | |
| Marketing Consultant | |
| Education | Roedean Moira House |
| University of London | |
| University of East London | |
| Moira House Girls School | |
| Alma mater | University of East London |
| Parents | Doodnauth Singh |
| Savitri Singh | |
| Children | 3 |
| Date of Reg. | |
| Date of Upd. | |
| ID | 399576 |
Gina Miller Life story
Gina Nadira Miller is a Guyanese-British business owner and activist who initiated the 2016 R v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union court case against the British government over its authority to implement Brexit without approval from Parliament.
Biography
Gina miller is a british author and activist born on 10th october 1965 in london.England.She is 5 feet 5 inches tall and weighs around 55 kgs.She has brwon eyes and a slim body type.Her zodiac sign is libra.Family
Gina miller is the daughter of john miller and mary miller.She has two siblings.A brother and a sisetr.She is married to alan milelr and has two children.Education and Career
Gina miller studied at the university of london and graduated with a degree in english literature.She thne went on to pursue a career in writing and activism.She is best known for her work in the brxeit campaign.Where she successfully challenged the british goevrnment in the supreme court.Life Story
Gina miller was born and raised in london.England.She was always passionate about writing and activism.And she pursued her dreams with determinatino.She was an active member of the brexit campaign and was succsesful in challenging the british government in the supreme court.Her success in the campaign has made her a household name in the uk.Success
Igna miller is a successful author and activist.She is best known for her work in the brexit campaign.Where she successfully challenged the british government in the supreme court.She has also written severla books on the subject of brexit and has been featured in numerous publications.She is an inspiration to many and her success is a testament to her hard work and dedication.Gina Miller's political party bank account to be closed
...By Nick EardleyBBC political correspondentAnti-Brexit campaigner Gina Miller had a bank account for her political party closed without explanation...
Who is the new chief judge of the Supreme Court?
... In 2017, he was one of the three judges of the Supreme court, the cleaved against the judgment in the Brexit court financier Gina Miller...
Gina Miller: Police investigate contract killer crowdfunding page
...Businesswoman Gina Miller has had to employ round-the-clock security after court victories on Brexit Police are investigating a crowdfunding page which sought to raise £10,000 to have campaigner Gina Miller killed...
The Papers: Reaction to lorry deaths the focus on front pages
... That message is echoed by the Remain campaigner Gina Miller...
Week in pictures: 21 - 27 September 2019
... Gina Miller, who led campaigners against the suspension of Parliament, appears outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday, in London, following the ruling that the suspension was unlawful...
Supreme Court ruling: Pictures from day of drama
... Gina Miller, who led campaigners against the suspension of Parliament, said: This prime minister must open the doors of Parliament tomorrow...
The Papers: Johnson 'defiant' after 'damning' court ruling
...Campaigner Gina Miller spoke outside the Supreme Court after its ruling The Supreme Court ruling dominates the front pages...
Gina Miller: The woman who won two Brexit legal cases
...Gina Miller is the businesswoman and campaigner who has twice led legal challenges against the government and won...
Supreme Court to give historic Parliament suspension ruling
The highest court in the UK is making a historic ruling on whether Boris Johnson 's decision to suspend Parliament for five weeks was lawful.
Ministers say the suspension, or prorogation, is not a court matter, But critics argue it was intended to limit scrutiny of the PM's Brexit plans.
If The Judgement - due at 10:30 BST - Goes against Mr Johnson, Parliament could be reconvened immediately.
it will "abide by the ruling" of the Supreme Court.
But Mr Johnson - who is in New York for a UN climate conference - has refused to rule out seeking to prorogue Parliament for a second time if the ruling Goes against him.
Parliament is currently due to return on 14 October, with the UK scheduled to leave the EU on 31 October.
The three-day hearing at the Supreme Court dealt with two appeals - One from campaigner and businesswoman Gina Miller , the second from the government.
Mrs Miller was appealing against the English High Court's decision that the prorogation was "purely political" and not a matter for the courts.
The government was appealing against the ruling by Scotland's Court of Session that the prorogation was "unlawful" and had been used to "stymie" Parliament .
The Challenge in the Scottish Court was brought by a cross-party group of MPs and peers led by the SNP's Joanna Cherry .
Campaigner Gina Miller first challenged the suspension of Parliament in The High CourtThe BBC's legal correspondent Clive Coleman said the Supreme Court had to resolve the two dramatically contradictory rulings.
He said if the justices ruled Mr Johnson's advice to The Queen was unlawful, either because of an improper motivation or because of the effect of the decision - with legislation lost and Parliamentary scrutiny improperly denied - it could lead to calls for the PM to resign.
Asked whether he would resign in such circumstances, Mr Johnson told the BBC: "I'm going to wait and see what The Judgement is," adding that the government "fully respects The Law and fully respects the judiciary".
During the Supreme Court case, government lawyer Lord Keen QC said it was "forbidden territory" for judges to intervene on political arguments about when and how Parliament is suspended.
However, Lord Pannick QC, representing Mrs Miller, argued the "exceptional length" of the prorogation was "strong evidence" that the Prime Minister 's motive was to "silence Parliament ", which he saw as an obstacle to his political aims.
Mr Johnson said he was proroguing Parliament in order to hold a new Queen's Speech on 14 October to outline the government's legislative plans for the year ahead.
However, the timing has been controversial because it reduced the time Parliament was sitting ahead of the Brexit deadline, with MPs unable to put questions to ministers or scrutinise government legislation during the suspension.
Later This Morning , we will have a Judgement handed down at the Supreme Court that will make political History - One Way or The Other .
The President of the Supreme Court, Lady Hale , does not do spoilers. So nobody other than the justices who will gather later know what is going to be said exactly.
The General expectation, however, is that the government will lose - which is very serious in and of itself - But we have no idea just how serious yet.
Will the court judge that the Prime Minister misled The Queen ? That is about as serious as it gets.
Or will they want to draw a line in The Sand and say this appears to have been disproportionate, But wont actually recommend any action?
It could be A Day that really, really Changes things.
What could happen next?The Supreme Court must first decide whether prorogation is a matter for the courts - justiciable, in legal parlance - and if so, whether the decision of Mr Johnson to do it was lawful.
If the government wins, then nothing Changes - Parliament remains suspended until 14 October.
But things could get complicated if the justices decide Mr Johnson acted unlawfully.
In documents submitted to the court, the government said it could see three options if the court ruled against it - and in some scenarios, it might suspend Parliament all over again.
But Lord Pannick said all the judges needed to do was declare the suspension unlawful. The Prime Minister would not have to take any action and the Speakers of The Commons and Lords could decide How To proceed.
boris johnson, uk parliament, unlawful parliament suspension, uk supreme court, brexit
Source of news: bbc.com
Gina Miller Photos
