Charlize Theron

---

Hundreds of potential jurors have said they can not be impartial in Harvey Weinstein 's rape trial

Harvey Weinstein is about to go On Trial and the 12 men and women in New York responsible for determining whether he is guilty.

Jury selection is underway, with the former Hollywood producer accused of five charges, including rape and predatory sexual assault in connection with two alleged victims.

find, But the impartial juries for such a high-profile case - One that galvanized the #MeToo Movement in The World - could be difficult.

The court has summoned 2,000 potential jurors for the case - about five times More Than Normal - easy to find 12 suitable regular jurors and six alternate jurors.

And on The First day of jury selection, a third of the potential jurors were present, dismissed outright, according to The Judge , You don't think You could be impartial.

"The First few days of jury selection has already underlined how difficult it will be," Valerie Hans , a law professor and jury expert at Cornell University , says.

" If You have a large number of People who say they can not be impartial, it is a Wake-up Call , because most of the People think of themselves as generally fair. "

Why is juror selection particularly difficult This Time ? Salma Hayek and Charlize Theron have not been named as a possible witness for The Trial -Jury selection often takes a couple of hours, or A Day or two.

But The Process can be very drawn to a lot more, especially in high-profile trials. In the O. J. Simpson murder case, took it to be selected almost 11 weeks for a jury.

The Judge Harvey Weinstein study, Two Weeks assigned for the selection of The Jury , throughout the study, expected to be up to two months, meaning that many potential jurors may be deterred required by the amount of time.

And in this case, "were claims against the cream of Tartar through a very High Profile , high visibility People " - there is "extensive outreach work" and a high number of claims against him, The Jury selection even more difficult, Prof Hans said.

Xorje Olivares, the at the court at 8. January as a prospective juror, was One of the dozens of People who ruled themselves.

He told the BBC his support for the #MeToo Movement , and the fact that he knew several People , the survivors of sexual assault, meant that he felt that he could not be impartial.

"personally, I felt nothing But Disgust . even in the same room as he, and I, Mr. Olivares, the host of a radio felt very disgusting," show said. "I knew I had these biased views, and I would bring You to the case. "

On The Other hand, Top Model Gigi Hadid - who had also reported for Jury Duty - court said she could remain impartial, although he met with Weinstein and actress Salma Hayek , One of the study tools the potential.

Hadid, who lives in Manhattan and studied criminal psychology, said The Judge , they would keep "an Open Mind on the facts" - if selected - But it was dismissed on Thursday, 16. January, when The Jury pool was whittled down.

As is selected by The Jury and what kind of judges Weinstein lawyers? Although it is known how the selection of The Jury , it is actually a process of elimination.

Many potential jurors will be dismissed from the outset - either because they say they can not be impartial, or because of scheduling conflicts.

the rest of the will be asked to fill out a questionnaire where You are asked about your education, prior jury service, if they know People working in the entertainment industry, and whether they have been victims of physical or sexual abuse. to be able to

Then the lawyers for both sides in question, the released You in court and get the potential jurors, if The Judge agrees that You cannot be impartial - this is known as a challenge for cause.

In the United States, lawyers are allowed to remove A Number of potential jurors without stating a reason (also known as a peremptory challenge), as long as it is not on the basis of ethnicity or gender.

Peremptory challenges are controversial, and Some - the UK, she made in 1988 - because critics believe that lawyers are trying to tend to The Jury in a certain way and to a randomly selected jury is more just.

However, in the USA, they are regarded as an important part of the constitutional right to examination by an impartial jury.

Mr Weinstein is a trial, lawyers on each Side allowed to dismiss up to 20 possible regular jurors, says Prof Hans. Lawyers for both sides try to establish that The Jury that You believe that You are cheaper on your Side .

Harvey Weinstein attending court with a room frame was The Prosecutor wants The Jury relating to the alleged victim, while the defense, The Jury wants to, "see themselves as the accused," said Thaddeus Hoffmeister, professor of law at the University of Dayton.

It is the opinion of the public Prosecutor's office may want to choose the younger jurors, because of their understanding of the #MeToo Movement .

He added that Mr Weinstein is "in a unique position" that "a lot of People will have difficulties in relation to".

"You 'd really have to a jury of CEOs, or People who are already in the position of Power need. "

What strategies could use the lawyers? Mr Weinstein has the team employed a jury-Consultant expert support to lawyers during The Jury selection, inter alia, through the community surveys and the development of profiles of favorable and unfavorable jurors.

in addition, You are likely to see public Social Media posts of all the potential jurors, if You are commenting on the #MeToo Movement -although allowed a "friend" jurors.

"Each Side is a perfect judge, You 're looking for," said Alan Tuerkheimer, a jury Consultant . However, You can't be too obvious about who they want to - because it is clear, You want a potential juror, on The Other hand, would "probably beat".

Instead, he compares it to a "chess game" - where each Side tries to guess what jurors are good for the opposition, And Then You dismiss them. to want to

"The defense jurors who believe that women sometimes make the things to get more powerful men in Trouble go. the Prosecutor wants to the People who think that any questioning of the account of the victim is off limits. "

Prof Hans results of the survey and the online research tells, can often the lawyers can help "to identify in advance People , the narrow-minded on your case".

This is particularly useful if it allows You to ask the potential jurors questions show that to The Judge that You cannot be impartial, because then You can be dismissed, and by a "challenge for cause", without the lawyers with One of their peremptory challenges.

Finally, to write with any high-profile study, The Risk of "stealth jurors" - potential jurors with an agenda, or hope, is a tell-all book afterwards.

" If someone seems too eager to be in a jury, all parties should Be Careful ," Mr. Tuerkheimer says, adding that this has led to retrials in The Past .

how is the circuit on a high-profile study? In the United States, The Names of the jurors are often accessible to the public, and former jurors to have given the intensive media attention, or favor with the family and friends that disagree with your judgment.

Harvey Weinstein is a sample of the demonstrators, James Matsumoto has attracted, who was reminded The Jury foreman in The First corruption trial against the former Governor of Illinois Rod Blagojevich , the fact that the court was a room full of journalists, when he was asked as a potential juror.

"There are several hundred People in the room at the time. It's a little nerve-wracking, because You don't have anybody there with You in The Jury Box - You 're not alone and handed a microphone, so that everyone can hear in the courtroom, what You have to say. "

He believes the high-profile nature helped of the study, concentrate the mind on The Jury , because it made them aware of how important the case was.

An unexpected result of the fact that "most of the People that gained weight" during The Trial , which lasted almost two months.

jurors were masked during The Day , and had to eat lunch together in the courtyard, meant, what, "You are not getting very much exercise, and it's all Fast Food , because You need something quick and in the vicinity of the Court House ".

He was surprised to find that journalists were also interested to find out, where The Jury ordered lunch - bearing in mind that it is a "coup", if You were able to have lunch decisions.

But the attention of the media was "very intense" as soon as The Trial ended with The Jury 's guilty find Blagojevich a census, But to not be able to reach a unanimous Verdict on 23 other charges.

On His Way home, he remarked, "a whole bunch of People standing in front of My House ".

Other members of The Jury had journalists knocking on their doors while a helicopter was hovering over their home.

harvey weinstein, harvey weinstein trial, united states

Source of news: bbc.com