Amber Rudd
Use attributes for filter ! | |
Gender | Female |
---|---|
Age | 60 |
Web site | www.amberrudd.co.uk |
Date of birth | August 1,1963 |
Zodiac sign | Leo |
Born | London |
United Kingdom | |
Spouse | A. A. Gill |
Children | Flora Gill |
Alasdair Gill | |
Siblings | Roland Rudd |
Height | 178 (cm) |
Job | Politician |
Journalist | |
Education | University of Edinburgh School of History, Classics and Archaeology |
The University of Edinburgh | |
Queen's College | |
Cheltenham Ladies' College | |
Official site | parliament.uk |
Parents | Tony Rudd |
Ethne Rudd | |
Previous position | Minister for Women and Equalities of the United Kingdom (2019–2019) |
Nationality | British |
Date of Reg. | |
Date of Upd. | |
ID | 398872 |
Amber Rudd Life story
Amber Augusta Rudd is a British former politician who served as Home Secretary from 2016 to 2018 and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions from 2018 to 2019. She was a Member of Parliament for Hastings and Rye, first elected in 2010, representing the Conservative Party, and stood down from parliament in 2019.
Biography
Amber rudd is a former home secretary of the united kingdom.She was born on august 1963 in london.England.She is 5 feet inches tall and weighs around kg.She has blue eyes and a slim body type.Her zodiac sign is leo and she is of british nationality.Education and Career
Amber rudd attended cheltenham ladies college and then wnet on to study at the unievrsity of edinburgh.Where she graduated with a degree in hitsory.She then went on to pursue a career in investment banking and later worked as a financial journalist.In 2010.She was elected as the member of parliament for hastings and rye and was appointed as the home secretary in 2016.Family and Relationships
Ambre rudd is the daughter of tony rudd and ethne fitzgerald.She has two siblings.A brother and a sister.She is married to aa gill and has two children frmo her previous marriage.Success
Amber rudd is best known for her work as the home secretary of the united kingdom.She was the first female home secretary since and was responsible for introducing a number of reforms to the immigration system.She also oversaw the introduction of the investigatory powers cat.Which gave the police and seucrity services greater powers to access digital data.Most Important Event
The most important event in amber rudd s career was her resignation as home secretary in april 2018.This was due to her involvement in the windrush scandal.In wihch it was revealed that the home office had wrongly deported or detained people who had the right to liev in the uk.Heating on prescription trial suggests fewer NHS visits
... Former energy secretary Amber Rudd, who chairs the Warm Home Prescription task force, said the group was already in conversations with a number of health trusts keen to try similar schemes in their area...
Manchester Arena: Ex-bomb suspect regained citizenship in MI5 U-turn
... In July 2017, the home secretary Amber Rudd removed his citizenship...
Ex-Tory home secretary Amber Rudd says Rwanda plan is 'brutal'
... Amber Rudd told GB News it was " extraordinary" the current home secretary had said it was her " dream" to see a plane take off for Rwanda...
Liz Truss' special adviser suspended and faces investigation
... He previously worked for Ms Truss when she was chief secretary to the Treasury before he became a special advisor to Amber Rudd...
Who is Kwasi Kwarteng? New UK chancellor likes a challenge
... That same year, he married solicitor Harriet Edwards, having previously dated former Home Secretary Amber Rudd...
Ukraine: Does the Home Office need to get a grip?
... Former Home Secretary Amber Rudd told the BBC that the Home Office needed a whole new approach rather than business as usual, saying it was " baffling and disappointing" that so few visas had so far been issued to Ukrainian refugees...
Manchester Arena bomb: Man with alleged links has citizenship restored
... The original decision was taken by Amber Rudd when she was home secretary...
Cabinet reshuffle: Who is Boris Johnson, the new Cabinet?
......
General election 2019: Six ways to improve TV debates
TV election debates are still a bit of a novelty in the UK.
Each Time an election is called, there's the question of whether any will take place, how they will be organised and who will take part. Broadcasters are still experimenting - This Time putting on Two -way debates, seven-way debates, a Climate Change debate and a special youth audience debate, among other permutations.
So is there room for improvement? And, if so, what might that look and sound like? Here are some expert suggestions.
1. Turn off The Microphones Then Home Secretary Amber Rudd and Ukip leader Paul Nuttall took part in the 2017 debatesNo-one likes it when leaders interrupt and talk over each other. It puts the focus on confrontation rather than discussion and does little to showcase anyone's qualities as a potential Prime Minister . As US academic Bryan Van Norden puts it, "There is absolutely no professional or political context in which elegantly interrupting others or being interrupted by others is a useful skill. "
He suggests simply switching off leaders' microphones when it's not their turn to speak. As soon as each person has finished talking, off it goes and the next one turns on.
Knowing they will go silent could also stop them "filibustering", or trying to Run Down The Clock by refusing to stop talking.
2. Go old-school - Force politicians to just. . debate Tony Benn and Roy Jenkins debated each other in 1975, with David Dimbleby moderatingUK televised debates tend to feature glitzy sets, rows of podiums and heavy intervention from moderators. They are also often quite short by international standards. Time can therefore be tight and the result heavy on soundbites and low on substance.
It wasn't always like this. One of the UK's earliest televised political debates was between rival Labour frontbenchers Roy Jenkins and Tony Benn during The 1975 European referendum campaign. They debated the Single Issue for 50 minutes, with no studio audience, no fancy set and very little intervention. Its often viewed now as a model of "proper" debate - Two intellectual heavyweights tussling with serious issues, listening to each other's points and responding reasonably.
The French presidential debates have run on a similar no-frills model since the 1970s. Candidates sit across a table and there's no studio audience. The Most recent, between Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen, lasted Two -and-a-half hours and drew an audience of 16. 5 million. It was brutal, with the pair trading bitter insults, "But it didn't half make for riveting viewing," said. "[A]nd at the end of The Day , The Debate did its Job . " No One who watched was left in any doubt who stood for what.
3. Robot fact-checkersIf we can't trust politicians to get facts right and tell The Truth , then having debates at all is pointless.
Much effort already goes into fact-checking, with the likes of independent fact-checking charity Full Fact and the deploying journalists to scour statistics and consult experts in order to verify politicians' claims. Viewers can get updates online during debates or read the verdicts afterwards. But of course not everyone does this, meaning politicians might not be adequately held to account.
So the race is on to speed up fact-checking and put it at The Heart of the debates themselves.
The Bbc News channel already uses on-screen Reality Check "push-backs" - or text Boxes - during its live debate broadcasts. And Full Fact has started live checking for other broadcasters, such as LBC.
But as Will Moy, Full Fact's chief executive, says, "It's something audiences really want But it's hard to do it Fast Enough to make it matter. "
The game-changer looks likely to be the use of Artificial Intelligence . Full Fact is developing software that can check facts far faster than humans, training machines to spot claims and trawl for data which can prove them right or wrong, So The Day when we see automated fact-checks appearing on TV screens in Real Time during debates may not be far off.
4. Ban cheering and clappingBack in 2010 the UK's first modern TV election debate took place in front of a respectful and hushed studio audience, There was no jeering or cheering and they were banned from clapping. Since then, audiences have become more vocal, with spectators cheering, clapping and even booing. It can feel a bit like Punch and Judy.
Dr Nick Anstead, associate professor at the London School of Economics' media and communications department, thinks we should go back to Silence - and aim for an audience of genuinely undecided voters. "It would at the very least remove the distortion of the audiences we now tend to have. It would change the atmosphere in the studio and make it less of a bear pit. "
5. Make The Audience more real "Politicians have yet to connect emotionally with audiences," says one expertDebates routinely involve ordinary members of The Public - often by asking them to submit questions for politicians to answer. But this could be taken further. Stephen Coleman , professor of Political Communication at the University of Leeds, suggests asking people to send in video clips about their lives and problems, which could be sprung on the leaders mid-debate. "What specifically will you do to help this person?" they could be asked.
Or could broadcasters rip up The Debate formula altogether and task politicians with convincing a real voter, while the cameras roll?
Matthew Flinders , professor of politics at the University of Sheffield would like to see "not a debate But a conversation with someone picked out from The Public , who would sit down and get to know The Politician , understand about their life, where they're coming from and how that flows into their their policies and beliefs. "
It could make it harder for politicians to wriggle out of questions and expose them to intense scrutiny - But it would also give them the chance to come across as "normal".
This could be electoral Gold Dust : "It's an element that's been missing so far, No politician has really made an emotional connection with voters," Prof Flinders says.
6. Regulate themSince the UK has never settled on rules for debates, broadcasters and politicians must thrash them out Each Time . This year the Lib Dems and SNP went to the court to challenge ITV's decision not to include Jo Swinson and Nicola Sturgeon in its prime ministerial debate - though The Challenge was rejected.
Dr Anstead says there are three conflicting dynamics surrounding debates: the politicians, who want to get their messages across and "will do anything to avoid generating a negative clip that could go viral"; the broadcasters "who just want to make good TV"; and "the democratic need to actually inform voters".
Although politicians and broadcasters would dispute this characterisation, The Absence of proper rules means the "first Two are dominating at the moment", says Dr Anstead.
Like the US, Canada has an independent commission tasked with organising official election debates. There are clear rules, consistent formulas for deciding who gets to be in which debates and they are the same from year to year. In the UK, Sky News has been pressing for something similar, with its Make Debates Happen campaign. This year its petition received More Than 140,000 signatures and was debated in Parliament.
The government's response? "Televised election debates are a matter for Political Parties . to change electoral law to make the debates mandatory. "
tv political debates, media
Source of news: bbc.com